Dressler v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dressler v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.

22 A.D.2d 780, 254 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2759

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 22 A.D.2d 780 (Dressler v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dressler v. Socony Mobil Oil Co., 22 A.D.2d 780, 254 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment entered April 22, 1964, dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiffs’ case, unanimously reversed, on the law, and a new trial directed, with $50 costs to abide the event. Defendants’ use of the sidewalk [781]*781was a special use for the ingress and egress of motor vehicles to and from the gasoline station. The evidence establishes questions of fact as to the existence of a dangerous sidewalk condition consequent on said special use. (Mullins v. Siegel-Cooper Co., 183 N. Y. 129; Wylie v. City of New York, 286 App. Div. 720; Nickelsburg v. City of New York, 263 App. Div. 625; Joel v. Electrical Research Prods., 94 F. 2d 588.) Concur — Botein, P. J., McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment entered April 22, 1964, dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiffs’ case, unanimously reversed, on the law, and a new trial directed, with $50 costs to abide the event. Defendants’ use of the sidewalk [781]*781was a special use for the ingress and egress of motor vehicles to and from the gasoline station. The evidence establishes questions of fact as to the existence of a dangerous sidewalk condition consequent on said special use. (Mullins v. Siegel-Cooper Co., 183 N. Y. 129; Wylie v. City of New York, 286 App. Div. 720; Nickelsburg v. City of New York, 263 App. Div. 625; Joel v. Electrical Research Prods., 94 F. 2d 588.) Concur — Botein, P. J., McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 780, 254 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dressler-v-socony-mobil-oil-co-nyappdiv-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack