Dressler v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.

22 A.D.2d 780, 254 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2759
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1964·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment entered April 22, 1964, dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiffs’ case, unanimously reversed, on the law, and a new trial directed, with $50 costs to abide the event. Defendants’ use of the sidewalk [781]*781was a special use for the ingress and egress of motor vehicles to and from the gasoline station. The evidence establishes questions of fact as to the existence of a dangerous sidewalk condition consequent on said special use. (Mullins v. Siegel-Cooper Co., 183 N. Y. 129; Wylie v. City of New York, 286 App. Div. 720; Nickelsburg v. City of New York, 263 App. Div. 625; Joel v. Electrical Research Prods., 94 F. 2d 588.) Concur — Botein, P. J., McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dressler v. Socony Mobil Oil Co., 22 A.D.2d 780, 254 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

22 A.D.2d 780 (Dressler v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nguyen v. Brentwood School District
239 A.D.2d 406 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Lobel v. Rodco Petroleum Corp.
233 A.D.2d 369 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Little v. City of Albany
169 A.D.2d 1013 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)