Dressler v. McArdle

85 Misc. 444, 147 N.Y.S. 821
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 85 Misc. 444 (Dressler v. McArdle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dressler v. McArdle, 85 Misc. 444, 147 N.Y.S. 821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Guy, J.

This action, to recover for personal injuries sustained from being run down by a taxicab, is brought against the individual owner thereof as well as against the Independent Taxi Owners Association, a membership corporation, of which the taxicab owner was a member.

There is abundant evidence to sustain the judgment against the individual defendant McArdle. As to the defendant corporation, the evidence shows it is a [445]*445membership corporation composed of the owners of taxicabs. The fact that it permits its members to affix its initials and name to their cabs is not a representation that it owns or operates the cabs of its members, and no more establishes liability for their tortious acts than would the permitted use of the flag or emblem of a yacht club or university create liability for the acts of members using such emblems.

Judgment reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs to defendant corporation; judgment affirmed, with costs, as to defendant McArdle.

Bijur and Pendleton, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, with costs, to defendant corporation; judgment affirmed, with costs, as to defendant McArdle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lassen v. Stamford Transit Co.
128 A. 117 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 Misc. 444, 147 N.Y.S. 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dressler-v-mcardle-nyappterm-1914.