Dresser v. Emerson Electric Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dresser v. Emerson Electric Co.

833 S.W.2d 47, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1206

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 28, 1992·No. No. 61206·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from a final award by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which denied compensation for certain medical expenses. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order [48]*48affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from a final award by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which denied compensation for certain medical expenses. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order [48]*48affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Dresser v. Emerson Electric Co., 833 S.W.2d 47, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1206 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

833 S.W.2d 47 (Dresser v. Emerson Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.