Dresser v. A. T. & G., Inc.

310 A.2d 147, 112 R.I. 917, 1973 R.I. LEXIS 1095
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided October 16, 1973·No. M. P. No. 73-55·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Petitioners-appellants’ motion to dismiss the third argument of appellees’ brief is denied without prejudice to right [918]*918of petitioners to renew the motion at the hearing on the merits.

Lavine & Sutherland, Paul P. Baillargeon, for petitioners-appellants. Macktaz, Keefer and Kirby, Paul A. Fontaine, for respondents-appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dresser v. A. T. & G., Inc., 310 A.2d 147, 112 R.I. 917, 1973 R.I. LEXIS 1095 (R.I. 1973).

310 A.2d 147 (Dresser v. A. T. & G., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

A. T. & G., Inc. v. Zoning Board of Review
322 A.2d 294 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1974)