Dresbach v. Davis

86 S.E. 256, 17 Ga. App. 79, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 268
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 11, 1915·No. 6147·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Russelb, C. J.

1. The plaintiff did not ask damages for a physical injury suffered in consequence of a battery, though two distinct batteries of her person by the defendant are alleged. The right to recover, as pleaded in the plaintiff’s petition, was based solely upon an injury to her feelings and to her peace and happiness, and, under the ruling in Chapman v. Western Union Tel. Co., 88 Ga. 763 (15 S. E. 901, 17 L. R. A. 430, 30 Am. St. R. 183), the law in this State does not allow a recovery. of damages for mere mental suffering and anguish, no matter how extreme or with what wantonness the injury to one’s feelings may have been inflicted. See, in this connection, Glenn v. Western Union Tel. Co., 1 Ga. App. 821 (2), 827, 829 (58 S. E. 83).

2. The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dresbach v. Davis, 86 S.E. 256, 17 Ga. App. 79, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 268 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

86 S.E. 256 (Dresbach v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stephens v. Waits
184 S.E. 781 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Hendricks v. Jones
111 S.E. 81 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Atchison, Topeka & Sante Fe Railway Co. v. Miller
163 P. 836 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1916)