Dreppard v. Dreppard

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dreppard v. Dreppard

247 S.W.3d 15, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 157, 2008 WL 222313

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dreppard v. Dreppard. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 45 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 29, 2008·No. ED 89943·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Dale Dreppard (“Father”) appeals from the trial court’s entry of judgment awarding fees in favor of Guardian Ad Litem, Mardi Montello (“GAL”), against *16 Father in the sum of $4,124.69. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Dale Dreppard (“Father”) appeals from the trial court’s entry of judgment awarding fees in favor of Guardian Ad Litem, Mardi Montello (“GAL”), against *16 Father in the sum of $4,124.69. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Dreppard v. Dreppard, 247 S.W.3d 15, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 157, 2008 WL 222313 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

247 S.W.3d 15 (Dreppard v. Dreppard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.