Dreppard v. Dreppard

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dreppard v. Dreppard

247 S.W.3d 15, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 157, 2008 WL 222313

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 29, 2008

DocketED 89943

StatusPublished

This text of 247 S.W.3d 15 (Dreppard v. Dreppard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dreppard v. Dreppard, 247 S.W.3d 15, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 157, 2008 WL 222313 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Dale Dreppard (“Father”) appeals from the trial court’s entry of judgment awarding fees in favor of Guardian Ad Litem, Mardi Montello (“GAL”), against *16 Father in the sum of $4,124.69. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Dale Dreppard (“Father”) appeals from the trial court’s entry of judgment awarding fees in favor of Guardian Ad Litem, Mardi Montello (“GAL”), against *16 Father in the sum of $4,124.69. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 S.W.3d 15, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 157, 2008 WL 222313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dreppard-v-dreppard-moctapp-2008.