Drepaul v. State

561 S.E.2d 825, 275 Ga. 50, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 2009, 2002 Ga. LEXIS 253
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 28, 2002
DocketS02A0012
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 561 S.E.2d 825 (Drepaul v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Drepaul v. State, 561 S.E.2d 825, 275 Ga. 50, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 2009, 2002 Ga. LEXIS 253 (Ga. 2002).

Opinion

Hunstein, Justice.

Appellant Lionel Drepaul was convicted of the felony murders of Keith Walton and Robert Coffen, aggravated assault and possession of a firearm and sentenced to life in prison.1 He appeals and we affirm.

1. The evidence at trial showed that the day before the murders occurred appellant met with Walton and Jackson to purchase drugs. Appellant learned that the drugs were fake and began searching for Walton and Jackson. Appellant and at least two others waited in appellant’s car in the vicinity of Walton’s vehicle and asked bystanders if they knew where they could find Walton and Jackson. When Walton, Coffen and another individual later entered Walton’s vehicle, appellant pulled alongside Walton’s car, scraping the driver’s side of the door. The passenger in the backseat of appellant’s vehicle pulled out a revolver and fired three shots into Walton’s car. Walton and Coffen were shot and subsequently died.

Considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we find that a rational trier of fact could have found appellant guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

2. Appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in its charge to the jury has been waived. The trial court twice asked counsel whether there were objections to the charge and on both occasions counsel neither objected to the portion of the charge now complained of nor reserved the right to object on motion for new trial or on appeal. Under such circumstances, appellant has waived the right to raise the issue on appeal. See Turner v. State, 272 Ga. 441 (2) (531 SE2d 354) (2000); Leavitt v. State, 264 Ga. 178 (3) (442 SE2d 457) (1994).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. [51]*51Decided March 28, 2002. Zell & Zell, Rodney S. Zell, for appellant. Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Bettieanne C. Hart, Alvera A. Wheeler, Assistant District Attorneys, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Madonna M. Heinemeyer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. State
609 S.E.2d 312 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
561 S.E.2d 825, 275 Ga. 50, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 2009, 2002 Ga. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drepaul-v-state-ga-2002.