Drennan v. Board of Canvassers
This text of 1 McGrath 1143 (Drennan v. Board of Canvassers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To compel the common council, as a board of canvassers, to re-convene and re-count the votes cast for supervisor of the second ward.
The circuit judge denied the writ. Affirmed July 2, 1895, with costs.
. Relator and one Meggs were candidates for the office. The canvassers met April 4 and adjourned to April 5. On the face of the returns Meggs received a majority of the votes cast. "Without canvassing the vote the board adjourned to April 15. [1146]*1146Tu the meantime Meggs obtained from tbe Wayne Circuit Court a mandamus requiring tbe board to meet, canvass tbe returns and issue a certificate of election to Meggs. On Apiil 15, tbe board met and complied witb tbe writ. Relator on that day filed bis petition for a re-count.
Respondent contended that the petition for a re-count was'filed too late; that the statute contemplates that the vote shall be canvassed •on the Thursday next succeeding the election, which was held on Monday, April 1; that the adjournment to the 15th was illegal, and upon this ground the circuit judge issued the writ applied for by Meggs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 1143, 106 McGrath 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drennan-v-board-of-canvassers-mich-1895.