Drenckhahn v. Simmons
This text of 172 A.D.2d 1080 (Drenckhahn v. Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: In moving for summary judgment, defendants failed to negate the existence of a factual issue whether the injury or impairment prevented plaintiff from performing substantially all of his usual and customary daily activities for at least 90 of the first 180 days following the accident (see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Summary judgment was, therefore, properly denied (cf., Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Queens County, Hentel, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 A.D.2d 1080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drenckhahn-v-simmons-nyappdiv-1991.