Drees Co. v. Hamilton Twp.

938 N.E.2d 362, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1460
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 2010
Docket2010-1548
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 938 N.E.2d 362 (Drees Co. v. Hamilton Twp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Drees Co. v. Hamilton Twp., 938 N.E.2d 362, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1460 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

Warren App. No. CA2009-11-150, 2010-Ohio-3473. Discretionary appeal accepted.

Brown, C.J., and O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Motion for admission pro hac vice of Christopher M. Whitcomb by August T. Janszen granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Village of Maineville v. Hamilton Township
902 F. Supp. 2d 1072 (S.D. Ohio, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
938 N.E.2d 362, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drees-co-v-hamilton-twp-ohio-2010.