Dredon Devonte Edward v. State of Florida

186 So. 3d 597, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2729, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 487
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 24, 2016
Docket4D14-4882
StatusPublished

This text of 186 So. 3d 597 (Dredon Devonte Edward v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dredon Devonte Edward v. State of Florida, 186 So. 3d 597, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2729, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 487 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Tucker v. State, 174 So.3d 486, 487-88 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (providing “[t]he remedy for an illegal sentence based.upon a negotiated plea is to seek to withdraw the plea” by.filing an “appropriate rule 3.850 motion”); .see also Nedd v. State, 855 So.2d 664, 665 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (“In that proceeding, the State will have the option to either agree to a resentencing or withdraw from the plea agreement and proceed to trial on the original charges.”).

WARNER, STEVENSON and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nedd v. State
855 So. 2d 664 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 So. 3d 597, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2729, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dredon-devonte-edward-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.