DREDDEN v. State
This text of 985 A.2d 390 (DREDDEN v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TONIO DREDDEN, Defendant Below, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
ORDER
HENRY DuPONT RIDGELY, Justice.
This 14th day of December 2009, the Court has considered the Clerk's notice to show cause that was sent to the appellant by certified mail on November 20, 2009. The Clerk's notice directed that the appellant show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed. The appellant has not responded to the notice to show cause. The appellant's failure to respond to the notice to show cause is deemed to be his consent to the dismissal of this appeal.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
985 A.2d 390, 2009 WL 4810558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dredden-v-state-del-2009.