Drayton v. U.S. Dept. of Justice

Fourth Circuit

Drayton v. U.S. Dept. of Justice

73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4161, 1996 WL 2766

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 4, 1996

Docket95-6646

StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 357 (Drayton v. U.S. Dept. of Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Drayton v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4161, 1996 WL 2766 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Bernard DRAYTON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; United States District
Court, at Charleston, South Carolina; Attorney
General of The State of South Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 95-6646.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 4, 1996.

Bernard Drayton, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Drayton v. United States Dep't of Justice, No. CA-95-379-2-8AJ (D.S.C. Apr. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Bernard DRAYTON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; United States District
Court, at Charleston, South Carolina; Attorney
General of The State of South Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 95-6646.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 4, 1996.

Bernard Drayton, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Drayton v. United States Dep't of Justice, No. CA-95-379-2-8AJ (D.S.C. Apr. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4161, 1996 WL 2766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drayton-v-us-dept-of-justice-ca4-1996.