Drayton v. State
This text of 22 So. 2d 444 (Drayton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case we have carefully considered the record and all exceptions noted in it, and all other matters there shown, and the argument of counsel for appellant. It is our opinion that there is nothing so presented not controlled by principles fully settled, and which do not need discussion at this time.
The trial was carefully conducted in an orderly and dignified manner, with counsel of defendant’s choice representing him, and taking every precaution to present defendant’s contentions. There was nothing unseemly or prejudicial to defendant, and no errors were committed by the court as shown by any exception taken.
The judgment must be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 So. 2d 444, 247 Ala. 25, 1945 Ala. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drayton-v-state-ala-1945.