Drayton v. State

22 So. 2d 444, 247 Ala. 25, 1945 Ala. LEXIS 347
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 29, 1945·No. 6 Div. 268.·Published

Opinion

FOSTER, Justice.

In this case we have carefully considered the record and all exceptions noted in it, and all other matters there shown, and the argument of counsel for appellant. It is our opinion that there is nothing so presented not controlled by principles fully settled, and which do not need discussion at this time.

The trial was carefully conducted in an orderly and dignified manner, with counsel of defendant’s choice representing him, and taking every precaution to present defendant’s contentions. There was nothing unseemly or prejudicial to defendant, and no errors were committed by the court as shown by any exception taken.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

GARDNER, C. J., and THOMAS and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Drayton v. State, 22 So. 2d 444, 247 Ala. 25, 1945 Ala. LEXIS 347 (Ala. 1945).

22 So. 2d 444 (Drayton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.