Drawdy v. Summerlin

Supreme Court of Florida

Drawdy v. Summerlin

122 So. 884, 98 Fla. 62

DecidedJune 22, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 122 So. 884 (Drawdy v. Summerlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Drawdy v. Summerlin, 122 So. 884, 98 Fla. 62 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

*63 Per Curiam.

This appeal is from a final decree in a foreclosure suit. There are fifteen assignments of error, all of which have been examined carefully. The proceedings were not in all respects conducted with that degree of care that they should have been, but we are impressed with the fact that such errors or irregularities as were committed were de minimis or harmless and that, therefore, the decree appealed from should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*63 Per Curiam.

This appeal is from a final decree in a foreclosure suit. There are fifteen assignments of error, all of which have been examined carefully. The proceedings were not in all respects conducted with that degree of care that they should have been, but we are impressed with the fact that such errors or irregularities as were committed were de minimis or harmless and that, therefore, the decree appealed from should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 So. 884, 98 Fla. 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drawdy-v-summerlin-fla-1929.