Drawdy v. Summerlin

122 So. 884, 98 Fla. 62
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 22, 1929·Published

Opinion

*63 Per Curiam.

This appeal is from a final decree in a foreclosure suit. There are fifteen assignments of error, all of which have been examined carefully. The proceedings were not in all respects conducted with that degree of care that they should have been, but we are impressed with the fact that such errors or irregularities as were committed were de minimis or harmless and that, therefore, the decree appealed from should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Drawdy v. Summerlin, 122 So. 884, 98 Fla. 62 (Fla. 1929).

122 So. 884 (Drawdy v. Summerlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.