Draughon v. HARNETT COUNTY BD. OF EDUCATION

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Draughon v. HARNETT COUNTY BD. OF EDUCATION

591 S.E.2d 521, 358 N.C. 131

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedFebruary 6, 2004

Docket358A03

StatusPublished

This text of 591 S.E.2d 521 (Draughon v. HARNETT COUNTY BD. OF EDUCATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Draughon v. HARNETT COUNTY BD. OF EDUCATION, 591 S.E.2d 521, 358 N.C. 131 (N.C. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

591 S.E.2d 521 (2004) 358 N.C. 131

Lynetta DRAUGHON, Personal Representative of the Estate of Max Draughon, Deceased
v.
HARNETT COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and Barry Honeycutt, Jackie Samuels, Stephen Ausley, Jason Spell, Anthony Barbour, Perry Saenz, Don Wilson, Jr., Raymond McCall, and Brian Strickland, in their Individual and Official Capacities.

No. 358A03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 6, 2004.

Keith A. Bishop, PLLC, by Keith A. Bishop, Durham, for plaintiff-appellant.

Tharrington Smith, LLP, by Jonathan A. Blumberg and Lisa Lukasik, for all defendant-appellees; Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, LLP, by Patricia L. Holland, for defendant-appellees Honeycutt, Ausley, and McCall; and Bailey & Dixon, LLP, by Gary Parsons and Warren Savage, Raleigh, for defendant-appellees Honeycutt, Ausley, McCall, Spell, and Wilson.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI