Draughn v. Embers Imperial House

Supreme Court of Florida

Draughn v. Embers Imperial House

196 So. 2d 434, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3966

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 15, 1967

DocketNo. 35960

StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 2d 434 (Draughn v. Embers Imperial House) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Draughn v. Embers Imperial House, 196 So. 2d 434, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3966 (Fla. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari and cross-petition we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 23, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The cross-petition is denied.

The Petitioner’s petition for attorney’s fees is also denied. The petition filed by Petitioner for defending against the cross-petition is granted in the amount of $250.00.

THORNAL, C. J., and TPIOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI