Drapktn b. Klebanoff

5 N.J. Misc. 531
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery
DecidedMay 11, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 N.J. Misc. 531 (Drapktn b. Klebanoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Drapktn b. Klebanoff, 5 N.J. Misc. 531 (N.J. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Backes, V. C.

The complainants’ testatrix and the defendant were equal partners, until the former’s death, in newspaper routes, under an agreement that the defendant should do all the work and be responsible for all the debts and out of the profits pay his partner $18 a week. Complainants’ testratrix died February 20th, 1927, and the defendant carried on the business until April 8th, when it was sold by a receiver appointed in this suit and the proceeds were divided.

The present petition is for an accounting by the defendant for the profits of the business derived during the time he ran it, after his partner died, which, if allowed, it is agreed, should be $18 a week. It is an established principle that where a partner continues the business after dissolution of the partnership he must account for the profits made after dissolution. Phillips v. Reeder, 18 N. J. Eq. 95, 99.

The defendant will he ordered to pay to the complainants the amount stipulated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blut v. Katz
99 A.2d 785 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 N.J. Misc. 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drapktn-b-klebanoff-njch-1927.