Draper v. Williams

Indiana Supreme Court

Draper v. Williams

8 Blackf. 574, 1848 Ind. LEXIS 139

DecidedFebruary 8, 1848

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Blackf. 574 (Draper v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Draper v. Williams, 8 Blackf. 574, 1848 Ind. LEXIS 139 (Ind. 1848).

Pincite

Opinion

AN affidavit, made for the purpose of procuring a foreign attachment, was offered in evidence. There was annexed to the affidavit a certificate purporting to be sighed and sealed by A. B., stating that the affidavit had been sworn, in the city and state of New York, before said A. B., Commissioner in said state to take depositions, affidavits, &c., to be used or recorded in the state of Indiana, &c. Held, that without further proof, the affidavit was not admissible in evidence. Hagaman v. Stafford, 2 Blackf. 351. — Doughton v. Tillay, 4 id. 433. — Fellows v. Miller, ante, 231. See R. S. 1843, p. 200.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AN affidavit, made for the purpose of procuring a foreign attachment, was offered in evidence. There was annexed to the affidavit a certificate purporting to be sighed and sealed by A. B., stating that the affidavit had been sworn, in the city and state of New York, before said A. B., Commissioner in said state to take depositions, affidavits, &c., to be used or recorded in the state of Indiana, &c. Held, that without further proof, the affidavit was not admissible in evidence. Hagaman v. Stafford, 2 Blackf. 351. — Doughton v. Tillay, 4 id. 433. — Fellows v. Miller, ante, 231. See R. S. 1843, p. 200.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Blackf. 574, 1848 Ind. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/draper-v-williams-ind-1848.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack