Draper v. United States

Court of Claims

Draper v. United States

122 Ct. Cl. 208, 1952 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 98, 1952 WL 5923

United States Court of Claims·Decided April 8, 1952·No. No. 49560; No. 49936; Nos. 49954 and 49975; No. 49976; Nos. 50040 and 50083; Nos. 50040 and 50083; No. 50049; Nos. 50143 and 50388; No. 50163; No. 50192; No. 49911; Nos. 47509 and 50455; No. 48751·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam

: The pleadings and the issue presented here are identical with those in the case of Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. United States, No. 49759, decided January 9,1952. For the reasons stated in that case, plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment, to the extent that they ask for an adjudication that the jeeps involved in these actions should be classified and rated as passenger motor vehicles, are granted.

Entry of judgment is suspended pending the filing of a report by the General Accounting Office and the disposition of the issues relating to the proper amount to be paid to the plaintiffs for the transportation services herein involved.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

: The pleadings and the issue presented here are identical with those in the case of Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. United States, No. 49759, decided January 9,1952. For the reasons stated in that case, plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment, to the extent that they ask for an adjudication that the jeeps involved in these actions should be classified and rated as passenger motor vehicles, are granted.

Entry of judgment is suspended pending the filing of a report by the General Accounting Office and the disposition of the issues relating to the proper amount to be paid to the plaintiffs for the transportation services herein involved.

It is so ordered.

Draper v. United States, 122 Ct. Cl. 208, 1952 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 98, 1952 WL 5923 (cc 1952).

Pincite

122 Ct. Cl. 208 (Draper v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related