Draper v. United States

122 Ct. Cl. 208, 1952 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 98, 1952 WL 5923
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedApril 8, 1952
DocketNo. 49560; No. 49936; Nos. 49954 and 49975; No. 49976; Nos. 50040 and 50083; Nos. 50040 and 50083; No. 50049; Nos. 50143 and 50388; No. 50163; No. 50192; No. 49911; Nos. 47509 and 50455; No. 48751
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 122 Ct. Cl. 208 (Draper v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Draper v. United States, 122 Ct. Cl. 208, 1952 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 98, 1952 WL 5923 (cc 1952).

Opinion

Per Curiam

: The pleadings and the issue presented here are identical with those in the case of Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. United States, No. 49759, decided January 9,1952. For the reasons stated in that case, plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment, to the extent that they ask for an adjudication that the jeeps involved in these actions should be classified and rated as passenger motor vehicles, are granted.

Entry of judgment is suspended pending the filing of a report by the General Accounting Office and the disposition of the issues relating to the proper amount to be paid to the plaintiffs for the transportation services herein involved.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Union Pacific Railroad
133 Ct. Cl. 973 (Court of Claims, 1956)
Koppers Co.
130 Ct. Cl. 819 (Court of Claims, 1955)
Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
126 Ct. Cl. 950 (Court of Claims, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 Ct. Cl. 208, 1952 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 98, 1952 WL 5923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/draper-v-united-states-cc-1952.