Draper v. Beers

17 Abb. Pr. 163
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1863·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Leonard, J.

The affidavits to authorize an order of arrest for fraudulent representations, whereby the defendant procured the sale and delivery of personal property, must not only set forth the particular statements or representations made in order to obtain the property, but must also set forth in what respects they are false. A general allegation that the representations made are false and fraudulent, is not sufficient.

The affidavit here is defective in this respect.

The order of arrest is vacated, with $10 costs of motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Draper v. Beers, 17 Abb. Pr. 163 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1863).

17 Abb. Pr. 163 (Draper v. Beers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Diad v. Shibley
49 Misc. 315 (New York Supreme Court, 1906)