Draper v. Austin

46 Vt. 215
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided October 15, 1873·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wheeler, J.

The only point of exception that has been urged by counsel for the excepting party, or that is decided by the court, [218] is as to the question allowed to be asked of, and answered by, the plaintiff while he was testifying, as to how much the loss on the butter was. The plaintiff’s testimony tended to show a contract by which the defendant was to pay the plaintiff whatever loss there should be, if any, on the butter. The amount of the loss, although it was arrived at by oral and written communications had with other persons, was itself a fact which might be proved by any competent witness who had knowledge of it. These communications were not hearsay statements of the fact, but were a part of the transactions that constituted the fact.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Draper v. Austin, 46 Vt. 215 (Vt. 1873).

46 Vt. 215 (Draper v. Austin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.