Drange v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EF] L FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA Shas Hed BILLINGS DIVISION MAY 2 6 2020 Clerk, U S District Cou District □□ □□ JODIE and ANDY DRANGE, each individually and on behalf of other CV 20-30-BLG-SPW persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, ORDER
vs. MOUNTAIN WEST FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES 1-100, Defendants.
On April 24, 2020, the Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. (Doc. 8). On May 18, 2020, the Court granted the Plaintiffs leave to file a second amended complaint. (Doc. 27). The Plaintiffs filed their second amended complaint on May 19, 2020. (Doc. 28). The second amended complaint supersedes the first amended complaint, rendering the Defendant’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint moot. Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015). The Defendant’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint (Doc. 8) is therefore denied.
ye DATED this .% day of May, 2020.
“SUSAN P. WATTERS United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Drange v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (Drange v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.