Drane v. Streck

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio
DecidedJuly 29, 2024
Docket3:24-cv-00202
StatusUnknown

This text of Drane v. Streck (Drane v. Streck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Drane v. Streck, (S.D. Ohio 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

PATRINA DRANE, : Case No. 3:24-cv-202 : Petitioner, : : District Judge Michael J. Newman vs. : Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry : SHERIFF ROB STRECK, : : Respondent. :

DEFICIENCY ORDER

This matter is before the Court on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus prepared by Janitra Brown and Olakwesu Y. Elbey for petitioner Patrina Drane, who is currently incarcerated at the Montgomery County Jail. (Doc. 1, at PageID 1). The filing fee has been paid. However, two preliminary matters must be addressed. First, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, every pleading, written motion, and other paper shall be signed by the party if not represented by counsel. Here, Brown, who identifies herself as petitioner’s daughter and has submitted a durable power of attorney (POA), signed the petition on petitioner’s behalf. But it does not appear that either Brown or Olakwesu is an attorney licensed to practice law in this Court. Nor does it appear that petitioner is unable to prosecute this case on her own behalf. See Tate v. United States, 72 F. App’x 265, 266 (6th Cir. 2003) (“[T]o act on a prisoner’s behalf, a putative next friend must demonstrate that the prisoner is unable to prosecute the case on [her] own behalf due to ‘inaccessibility, mental incompetence, or other disability’ and that the next friend is ‘truly dedicated to the best interests of the person on whose behalf he seeks to litigate.’”) (quoting Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149, 163-4 (1990)). Therefore, notwithstanding the POA, neither Brown nor Olakwesu can appear on petitioner’s behalf in this habeas matter. Next, although the petition indicates that petitioner is facing drug charges (Doc. 1, at PageID 1), the petition does not provide any additional information regarding the status of the

charges or the court in which any proceedings have occurred. Without this information, the Court is unable to determine whether this matter is properly before this Court. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to return the petition (Doc. 1) to petitioner, Booking Number 24-006269, at the Montgomery County Jail.1 Should petitioner wish to proceed with this case, petitioner is ORDERED to sign the petition and return it to the Clerk of Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Petitioner is further ORDERED to file in this Court a written response providing, to the best of her knowledge, the status of her charges and the court in which any proceedings have occurred. Petitioner is advised that failure to respond to this Order within the requisite 30-day period may result in the case being dismissed for lack of prosecution. Should petitioner

need additional time to respond, petitioner should file a motion for extension of time. IT IS SO ORDERED.

July 29, 2024 /s/ Caroline H. Gentry CAROLINE H. GENTRY United States Magistrate Judge

1The Montgomery County Jail website indicates that petitioner is currently incarcerated under Booking Number 24- 006269. Viewed at: https://mont.miamivalleyjails.org/JAILBOOKING.ASPX?CJIS_OR_PARTY_ID=C1332468&JAILBOOKING_ID =51024501.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. Arkansas
495 U.S. 149 (Supreme Court, 1990)
Tate v. United States
72 F. App'x 265 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Drane v. Streck, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drane-v-streck-ohsd-2024.