Drake v. Wysocki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Drake v. Wysocki

143 A.D.2d 112, 531 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8389

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 8, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 143 A.D.2d 112 (Drake v. Wysocki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Drake v. Wysocki, 143 A.D.2d 112, 531 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8389 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated February 4, 1987, which denied her motion for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiffs had failed to meet the threshold requirements for serious injury pursuant to Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff Nicasio Drake submitted medical evidence in admissible form, which established prima facie that he had suffered a serious injury under Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Bassett v Romano, 126 AD2d 693). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Kunzeman and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated February 4, 1987, which denied her motion for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiffs had failed to meet the threshold requirements for serious injury pursuant to Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff Nicasio Drake submitted medical evidence in admissible form, which established prima facie that he had suffered a serious injury under Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Bassett v Romano, 126 AD2d 693). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Kunzeman and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 A.D.2d 112, 531 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drake-v-wysocki-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack