Drake v. True

56 A. 749, 72 N.H. 322, 1903 N.H. LEXIS 72
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 1, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 56 A. 749 (Drake v. True) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Drake v. True, 56 A. 749, 72 N.H. 322, 1903 N.H. LEXIS 72 (N.H. 1903).

Opinion

Walker, J.

1. As the testatrix was the owner of twenty shares of the stock of the National Mechanics and Traders Bank when she made her will, it is more probable than otherwise that she intended, in her bequests to her two nephews of ten shares each of the stock of that bank, to dispose specifically of the stock she then owned.. A finding that she gave them twenty shares of that stock generally, whether she happened to be the owner of any at her decease or not, could only be supported by evidence which is not disclosed by the case. As she had but ten shares at her decease, the two nephews, whom she made equal legatees of the twenty shares she possessed at the date of the will, are entitled to five shares each. Gardner v. Gardner, ante, p. 257; White v. Winchester, 6 Pick. 48; Trustees v. Tufts, 151 Mass. 76.

2. The case does not show that the administrator is legally interested in the second question submitted. For aught that appears, he may be able to settle the estate without resorting to the real estate which was occupied by the testatrix as a homestead. Under such circumstances a construction of the will defining the ownership of the land serves no useful purpose, and the advice of the court thereon is not given. Bailey v. McIntire, 71 N. H. 329.

Case discharged.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Estate of Bliss
379 A.2d 839 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1977)
In Re Doonan Estate
262 A.2d 281 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1970)
In re Estate of Kirkwood
207 N.E.2d 587 (Cuyahoga County Probate Court, 1965)
Vogel v. Saunders
92 F.2d 984 (D.C. Circuit, 1937)
Banfield v. Schulderman
3 P.2d 116 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1931)
Nashua Trust Co. v. Burke
152 A. 488 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1930)
Fidelity National Bank & Trust Co. v. Hovey
5 S.W.2d 437 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1928)
McAllister v. Elliot
140 A. 708 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1928)
Ross v. Church
90 A. 174 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1914)
Estate of O'Gorman
6 Coffey 245 (California Superior Court, 1910)
Jewell v. Appolonio
74 A. 250 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1909)
Chase v. Moore
64 A. 21 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1906)
Harvey v. Harvey
59 A. 621 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 A. 749, 72 N.H. 322, 1903 N.H. LEXIS 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drake-v-true-nh-1903.