Drake v. State

135 S.W. 123, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 615
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Drake v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 65 Tex. Crim. 282
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 22, 1911·Published

Opinion

HARPER, J.

The Assistant Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, because the recognizance does not charge that appellant was convicted of a misdemeanor, and does not use language that would state any offense against the laws of the state, neither does it show the punishment assessed against him.

The motion is sustained, and the cause dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Drake v. State, 135 S.W. 123, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 615 (Tex. 1911).

135 S.W. 123 (Drake v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.