Drake v. Paulhamus
69 F. 328, 15 C.C.A. 698, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2396
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Drake v. Paulhamus. Read the opinion of the Court — 66 F. 895 →
Opinion
In the petition for rehearing it is urged that the court overlooked the distinction between an assignment directly to [329] creditors, and one in trust for creditors. The distinction was not overlooked. 30 there was a trust: created between Paulhamus and ilie creditors, whose assignee he was, it was not created by Lindsay, the debtor. Lockhart v. Stevenson, 61 Pa. St. 64. The rehearing is therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Drake v. Paulhamus, 69 F. 328, 15 C.C.A. 698, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2396 (9th Cir. 1895).
69 F. 328 (Drake v. Paulhamus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.