Drake v. Mount
33 N.J.L. 441
This text of 33 N.J.L. 441 (Drake v. Mount) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Drake v. Mount, 33 N.J.L. 441 (N.J. 1867).
Opinion
At the close of the opening argument on the part of the counsel for plaintiff in error, the court affirmed the judgment below, without calling on the counsel of the defendant to respond.
No written opinion was delivered.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Beasley, C. J., Elmer, Vredenburgh, Bedle, Woodhull, Depue, Ogden, Fort, Wales, Clement, Vail, Kennedy. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
33 N.J.L. 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drake-v-mount-nj-1867.