Drake v. Mount
33 N.J.L. 441
Opinion
At the close of the opening argument on the part of the counsel for plaintiff in error, the court affirmed the judgment below, without calling on the counsel of the defendant to respond.
No written opinion was delivered.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Beasley, C. J., Elmer, Vredenburgh, Bedle, Woodhull, Depue, Ogden, Fort, Wales, Clement, Vail, Kennedy. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Drake v. Mount, 33 N.J.L. 441 (N.J. 1867).
33 N.J.L. 441 (Drake v. Mount) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.