Drake v. Lewis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Drake v. Lewis

85 S.E. 618, 16 Ga. App. 388, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 642

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 3, 1915

Docket5847

StatusPublished

This text of 85 S.E. 618 (Drake v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Drake v. Lewis, 85 S.E. 618, 16 Ga. App. 388, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 642 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Eussell, C. J.

1. The ruling in this ease is controlled by the decision in Drake v. Lewis, 13 Ga. App. 276, 280 (79 S. E. 167). The suit was upon a note, and the defense was predicated upon an alleged tort. See also Lee v. Harris, 88 Ga. 236 (14 S. E. 566); L. & N. Railroad Co. v. Spinks, 104 Ga. 696 (30 S. E. 968).

2. The court did not err in sustaining the motion to strike the answer of the defendant. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eussell, C. J.

1. The ruling in this ease is controlled by the decision in Drake v. Lewis, 13 Ga. App. 276, 280 (79 S. E. 167). The suit was upon a note, and the defense was predicated upon an alleged tort. See also Lee v. Harris, 88 Ga. 236 (14 S. E. 566); L. & N. Railroad Co. v. Spinks, 104 Ga. 696 (30 S. E. 968).

2. The court did not err in sustaining the motion to strike the answer of the defendant. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 S.E. 618, 16 Ga. App. 388, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drake-v-lewis-gactapp-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack