Drake v. Hess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Drake v. Hess

281 A.D. 1074, 122 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4373

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1953

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 281 A.D. 1074 (Drake v. Hess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Drake v. Hess, 281 A.D. 1074, 122 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4373 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Order insofar as appealed from reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted as to paragraph No. 1 of the demand, without costs. Memorandum: The defendants are entitled to know the names and addresses of the various persons who had previously been bitten as alleged in paragraphs third and fourth of the complaint in order to make preparation to meet such proof. (See Robson V. Driscoll, 278 App. Div. 847 ; 4 Carmody-Wait on New York Practice, § 18, p. 633.) All concur. (Appeal from part of an order denying a motion to require plaintiff to deliver to defendants a bill of particulars as set forth in the motion insofar as it denied demand for bill of particulars contained in paragraph 1.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Yaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order insofar as appealed from reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted as to paragraph No. 1 of the demand, without costs. Memorandum: The defendants are entitled to know the names and addresses of the various persons who had previously been bitten as alleged in paragraphs third and fourth of the complaint in order to make preparation to meet such proof. (See Robson V. Driscoll, 278 App. Div. 847 ; 4 Carmody-Wait on New York Practice, § 18, p. 633.) All concur. (Appeal from part of an order denying a motion to require plaintiff to deliver to defendants a bill of particulars as set forth in the motion insofar as it denied demand for bill of particulars contained in paragraph 1.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Yaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D. 1074, 122 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drake-v-hess-nyappdiv-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack