Drake v. Gabrey

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Drake v. Gabrey

805 So. 2d 1070, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 745, 2002 WL 112853

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 30, 2002

DocketNo. 4D00-4536

StatusPublished

This text of 805 So. 2d 1070 (Drake v. Gabrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Drake v. Gabrey, 805 So. 2d 1070, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 745, 2002 WL 112853 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

FARMER, J.

Drake argues that the trial court oppressively disrupted his ability to present his case opposing the injunctive relief sought against him, thereby depriving him of a full hearing. This Court has listened to the audio recording of such proceeding. Even though we do not endorse the tone and content of some of the statements by the exasperated trial judge, we are unable to find that the court violated appellant’s due process rights. Accordingly, we affirm.

STONE and HAZOURI, JJ. concur,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FARMER, J.

Drake argues that the trial court oppressively disrupted his ability to present his case opposing the injunctive relief sought against him, thereby depriving him of a full hearing. This Court has listened to the audio recording of such proceeding. Even though we do not endorse the tone and content of some of the statements by the exasperated trial judge, we are unable to find that the court violated appellant’s due process rights. Accordingly, we affirm.

STONE and HAZOURI, JJ. concur,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

805 So. 2d 1070, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 745, 2002 WL 112853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drake-v-gabrey-fladistctapp-2002.