Drake v. Drakoulis

304 A.D.2d 522, 756 N.Y.S.2d 881
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 7, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 304 A.D.2d 522 (Drake v. Drakoulis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Drake v. Drakoulis, 304 A.D.2d 522, 756 N.Y.S.2d 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Linda Chiesa appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated April 3, 2001, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A rear-end collision with a stopped vehicle creates a prima facie case of liability with respect to the operator of the moving vehicle and imposes a duty of explanation on the operator of the moving vehicle (see Maschka v Newman, 262 AD2d 615 [1999]; Niemiec v Jones, 237 AD2d 267 [1997]). However, a [523]*523driver of a motor vehicle has a duty to keep proper control of that vehicle, and to not stop suddenly or slow down without proper signaling so as to avoid a collision (Niemiec v Jones, supra, at 268). Sufficient evidence was submitted to raise triable issues of fact whether the defendant Linda Chiesa contributed to the accident by making a sudden stop and failing to give proper signals in compliance with Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1163 (see Maschka v Newman, supra). Ritter, J.P., Santucci, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kapoor v. Zahoor
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
Pearson v. Northstar Limousine, Inc.
123 A.D.3d 991 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Argueta v. Thind
37 Misc. 3d 849 (New York Supreme Court, 2012)
Hauswirth v. Transcare New York, Inc.
97 A.D.3d 792 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Zweeres v. Materi
94 A.D.3d 1111 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Balducci v. Velasquez
92 A.D.3d 626 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Gleason v. Villegas
81 A.D.3d 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Costa v. Eramo
76 A.D.2d 942 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Chiok v. C.S. Kouridakis
57 A.D.3d 706 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Foster v. Sanchez
17 A.D.3d 312 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Dawkins v. Stone
14 A.D.3d 588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Brodie v. Global Asset Recovery, Inc.
12 A.D.3d 390 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Volkov v. Girsh
9 A.D.3d 424 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
304 A.D.2d 522, 756 N.Y.S.2d 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drake-v-drakoulis-nyappdiv-2003.