Drake v. Drake

110 N.W. 270, 21 S.D. 182, 1907 S.D. LEXIS 4
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 10, 1907
StatusPublished

This text of 110 N.W. 270 (Drake v. Drake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Drake v. Drake, 110 N.W. 270, 21 S.D. 182, 1907 S.D. LEXIS 4 (S.D. 1907).

Opinion

HANEY, J.

This is an action for divorce, wherein the circuit court rendered a decree dissolving the marriage for an offense of the defendant, awarding the plaintiff $6,300 as permanent alimony. It also made an order requiring defendant to pay certain sums for plaintiff’s maintenance, pending further litigation, and for expenses and attorney’s fees. From this decree and this order the defendant appealed and stayed the execution of each. Now the plaintiff applies to this court for an order requiring the defendant to provide for the plaintiff’s maintenance during the continuance of the litigation, for attorney’s fees and expenses, and to reimburse her attorneys for money heretofore expended in her behalf.

Numerous affidavits were read in supoprt of and in opposition to the application. They have been carefully considered. No useful purpose would be served by an extended statement of facts. It clearly appears that the defendant should contribute to the plaintiff’s maintenance during the pendency of the appeals, and, as the judgment of the circuit court, if not reversed, may be affirmed or modified, and such orders made concerning expenses, maintenance, and alimony as shall be deemed just upon the hearing of such appeals upon the merits, nothing should now be considered except the plaintiff’s future support and the expenses of further litigation. Therefore defendant will be required to pay the plaintiff $25 per [183]*183month for her support during the pendency of the action in this court, the first payment to be made on or before February i, 1907, and $ioo- on or before March 1, 1907, to apply on the expenses of litigation in this court.

FULEER, P. J., has taken no part in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 N.W. 270, 21 S.D. 182, 1907 S.D. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drake-v-drake-sd-1907.