Drake v. Continental Insurance

100 A. 1069, 78 N.H. 604, 1917 N.H. LEXIS 61
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided February 6, 1917·Published

Opinion

*605 Walker, J.

This is an action of assumpsit upon certain policies of fire insurance. The parties submitted the question of the amount of the loss to arbitrators, who, after a hearing, made an award in writing. The court ruled that the plaintiff could not recover more than the amount of the award as damages, and he excepted. In the absence of briefs or arguments by any of the parties, no error is perceived. Barsantee v. Hartford, 73 N. H. 616. Justice seems to require that the order should be

Exception overruled.

Young, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Drake v. Continental Insurance, 100 A. 1069, 78 N.H. 604, 1917 N.H. LEXIS 61 (N.H. 1917).

100 A. 1069 (Drake v. Continental Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barsantee v. Hartford
63 A. 1118 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1906)