Drake v. Continental Insurance
This text of 100 A. 1069 (Drake v. Continental Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action of assumpsit upon certain policies of fire insurance. The parties submitted the question of the amount of the loss to arbitrators, who, after a hearing, made an award in writing. The court ruled that the plaintiff could not recover more than the amount of the award as damages, and he excepted. In the absence of briefs or arguments by any of the parties, no error is perceived. Barsantee v. Hartford, 73 N. H. 616. Justice seems to require that the order should be
Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 A. 1069, 78 N.H. 604, 1917 N.H. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drake-v-continental-insurance-nh-1917.