Drake v. Continental Insurance

100 A. 1069, 78 N.H. 604, 1917 N.H. LEXIS 61
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedFebruary 6, 1917
StatusPublished

This text of 100 A. 1069 (Drake v. Continental Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Drake v. Continental Insurance, 100 A. 1069, 78 N.H. 604, 1917 N.H. LEXIS 61 (N.H. 1917).

Opinion

*605 Walker, J.

This is an action of assumpsit upon certain policies of fire insurance. The parties submitted the question of the amount of the loss to arbitrators, who, after a hearing, made an award in writing. The court ruled that the plaintiff could not recover more than the amount of the award as damages, and he excepted. In the absence of briefs or arguments by any of the parties, no error is perceived. Barsantee v. Hartford, 73 N. H. 616. Justice seems to require that the order should be

Exception overruled.

Young, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barsantee v. Hartford
63 A. 1118 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A. 1069, 78 N.H. 604, 1917 N.H. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drake-v-continental-insurance-nh-1917.