Drake v. Cleveland
7 F. Cas. 1048, 3 D.C. 3, 3 Cranch 3
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 15, 1826
StatusPublished
This text of 7 F. Cas. 1048 (Drake v. Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Drake v. Cleveland, 7 F. Cas. 1048, 3 D.C. 3, 3 Cranch 3 (circtddc 1826).
Opinion
The Coukt, (Morsell, J., contra.,) was of opinion that the oath made by one of the plaintiffs, who were copartners in merchandise, in the form required by the act, was sufficient to ground the warrant upon, although he did not state in his oath that he was the acting partner, nor that the other partners were absent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 F. Cas. 1048, 3 D.C. 3, 3 Cranch 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drake-v-cleveland-circtddc-1826.