Drake v. Byram

134 A. 758, 100 N.J. Eq. 343, 15 Stock. 343, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 486
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 18, 1926·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The decree under review will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the conclusions of Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Drake v. Byram, 134 A. 758, 100 N.J. Eq. 343, 15 Stock. 343, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 486 (N.J. 1926).

134 A. 758 (Drake v. Byram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoover v. Roberts
74 P.2d 152 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1937)
Husted v. Husted
157 A. 666 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1931)