Drake v. Brown Manufacturing Co.

49 S.E. 590, 121 Ga. 550, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 227
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 21, 1904·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Candler, J.

A motion to set aside a judgment must be predicated upon some defect apparent upon the face of the record. Sweat v. Latimer, 119 Ga. 615, and cit. It was accordingly not error to sustain a demurrer to such a motion based upon the ground that the movant had never been served with proper process in the suit wherein the judgment sought to be set aside was rendered, when it affirmatively appeared upon the face of the record that he had been so served. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Busbee & Busbee, J. M., duPree, and J. H. Hall, for plaintiff in error. Whipple & McKenzie, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Drake v. Brown Manufacturing Co., 49 S.E. 590, 121 Ga. 550, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 227 (Ga. 1904).

49 S.E. 590 (Drake v. Brown Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walthour v. Mock
117 S.E.2d 885 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Tobin v. Tobin
91 S.E.2d 508 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Charles S. Martin Distributing Co. v. Southern Furnace Co.
76 S.E.2d 662 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Plunkett Warden v. Neal
41 S.E.2d 157 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Jackson v. Jackson
35 S.E.2d 258 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Fields v. Arnall
34 S.E.2d 692 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)