Drake & Cochren's Case

General Court of Virginia

Drake & Cochren's Case

6 Va. 665

DecidedJune 15, 1849

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Va. 665 (Drake & Cochren's Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Drake & Cochren's Case, 6 Va. 665 (Va. Super. Ct. 1849).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Court decides:

1st. That the Court ought not to permit the amendment of the record, by inserting the name of Francis P. Drake, nunc pro tunc, as proposed in the question adjourned.

[667]*6672d. That the entry upon the record is sufficient to shew that the indictment was found against Joseph, Cochren.

3d. That the motion to quash, ought to be overruled as to the defendant Joseph Cochren; and the proseention dismissed as to the defendant Drake: The Court not intending to express any opinion except on the particular points adjourned.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Court decides:

1st. That the Court ought not to permit the amendment of the record, by inserting the name of Francis P. Drake, nunc pro tunc, as proposed in the question adjourned.

[667]*6672d. That the entry upon the record is sufficient to shew that the indictment was found against Joseph, Cochren.

3d. That the motion to quash, ought to be overruled as to the defendant Joseph Cochren; and the proseention dismissed as to the defendant Drake: The Court not intending to express any opinion except on the particular points adjourned.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Va. 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drake-cochrens-case-vagensess-1849.