Drainage Commissioners v. Brinn
This text of 109 S.E. 90 (Drainage Commissioners v. Brinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
after stating the facts: It will be perceived on a perusal of this case that it is not substantially unlike Drainage Com. v. Credle, *448 ante, 442. The questions involved are the same, except as to the canal tolls, and that one is fully covered by what is said in the opinion filed in Credle’s case. This being so, it is unnecessary to discuss the ■matter further, as it would be a mere repetition of what has already been said in that case.
It would serve no useful purpose to go over in detail the excellent briefs filed by the counsel in these cases, as what we have said in the opinions filed by us at this term in the above case and Comrs. v. Davis, ante, 140, covers fully the entire ground of inquiry and investigation.
The judgment is therefore reversed, as the defendant is not entitled to the commissions or compensation he claims, and it will be so certified.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 S.E. 90, 182 N.C. 447, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drainage-commissioners-v-brinn-nc-1921.