Dragoo v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dragoo v. State

157 S.W.3d 409, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 387, 2005 WL 589300

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 15, 2005

DocketWD 63840

StatusPublished

This text of 157 S.W.3d 409 (Dragoo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dragoo v. State, 157 S.W.3d 409, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 387, 2005 WL 589300 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Gregg Dragoo appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Dragoo’s motion was denied after evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Gregg Dragoo appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Dragoo’s motion was denied after evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 S.W.3d 409, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 387, 2005 WL 589300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dragoo-v-state-moctapp-2005.