Dragani v. State
798 So. 2d 856, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15557, 2001 WL 1346418
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dragani v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 759 So. 2d 745 →
Opinion
In accordance with the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Florida v. Thomas, 789 So.2d 971 (Fla.2001), and the court’s directive in this case, we alter our decision to conform it to the holding in Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000).
[857]*857In sum, we affirm the concurrent sentences imposed on Dragani in this case, since they do not violate his double jeopardy rights. In all other regards, we reaffirm the balance of our prior decision in this case.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dragani v. State, 798 So. 2d 856, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15557, 2001 WL 1346418 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
798 So. 2d 856 (Dragani v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grant v. State
770 So. 2d 655 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
State v. Thomas
789 So. 2d 971 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)