Draeger Shipping Co. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 388
United States Customs Court·Decided July 31, 1957·No. No. 61104; protests 584775-G, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinions

[389]*389Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “K” consist of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), or Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and the items marked “L” of lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, supra, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Draeger Shipping Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 388 (cusc 1957).

39 Cust. Ct. 388 (Draeger Shipping Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 266 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)
A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States
33 Cust. Ct. 120 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)
Prime Fur Corp. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 83 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)