D.R. v. A.R.
This text of D.R. v. A.R. (D.R. v. A.R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 25-JUN-2026 09:06 AM Dkt. 16 ODSD
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I
D.R., Petitioner-Appellee, v. A.R., Respondent-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 3FDA-23-000072)
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Gluck, JJ.)
Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) The statement of jurisdiction and opening brief were due on or before March 27, 2026, and April 27, 2026, respectively; (2) Self-represented Respondent-Appellant A.R. failed to file either document or request an extension of time; (3) On May 4, 2026, the appellate clerk entered a default notice informing A.R. that the time for filing the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the matter would be called to the court's attention on May 14, 2026, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of the appeal, under Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Rules 12.1(e) and 30, and A.R. could request relief from default by motion; and (4) A.R. has not taken any further action in this appeal. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, June 25, 2026.
/s/ Karen T. Nakasone Chief Judge
/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge
/s/ Daniel M. Gluck Associate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
D.R. v. A.R., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dr-v-ar-hawapp-2026.