Dr. Ronda M. Bachenheimer/Meadowbrook Chiropractic v. Allstate Ins. Co.
This text of Dr. Ronda M. Bachenheimer/Meadowbrook Chiropractic v. Allstate Ins. Co. (Dr. Ronda M. Bachenheimer/Meadowbrook Chiropractic v. Allstate Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Carmen R. Velasquez, J.), entered February 19, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court as denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
Upon a review of the record, we agree with the Civil Court's determination that there is a triable issue of fact regarding the medical necessity of the services at issue (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]).
Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.
Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: September 15, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dr. Ronda M. Bachenheimer/Meadowbrook Chiropractic v. Allstate Ins. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dr-ronda-m-bachenheimermeadowbrook-chiropractic-v-allstate-ins-co-nyappterm-2016.