Dr. J.P. v. Chassin
619 N.E.2d 651, 82 N.Y.2d 694, 601 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 2309
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in Doe v Office of Professional Med. Conduct (81 NY2d 1050).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Smith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dr. J.P. v. Chassin, 619 N.E.2d 651, 82 N.Y.2d 694, 601 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 2309 (N.Y. 1993).
619 N.E.2d 651 (Dr. J.P. v. Chassin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Finelli v. Chassin
206 A.D.2d 717 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
MATTER OF McBARNETTE v. Sobol
632 N.E.2d 866 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
McBarnette v. Sobol
190 A.D.2d 229 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)