Dr. Helen Bruce v. R. Elliott Scearce

Eighth Circuit

Dr. Helen Bruce v. R. Elliott Scearce

521 F.2d 796, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 12749

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 16, 1975

Docket75-1225

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 521 F.2d 796 (Dr. Helen Bruce v. R. Elliott Scearce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dr. Helen Bruce v. R. Elliott Scearce, 521 F.2d 796, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 12749 (8th Cir. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a careful consideration of the record and of the briefs and arguments of the parties, the Court has concluded that the judgment of the District Court in Bruce v. Scearce, 390 F.Supp. 297 (E.D.Mo.1975), is based on findings that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. For these reasons, the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed on the basis of the trial court’s opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon a careful consideration of the record and of the briefs and arguments of the parties, the Court has concluded that the judgment of the District Court in Bruce v. Scearce, 390 F.Supp. 297 (E.D.Mo.1975), is based on findings that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. For these reasons, the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed on the basis of the trial court’s opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

521 F.2d 796, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 12749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dr-helen-bruce-v-r-elliott-scearce-ca8-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack