Dr. Helen Bruce v. R. Elliott Scearce

Eighth Circuit

Dr. Helen Bruce v. R. Elliott Scearce

521 F.2d 796, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 12749

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided September 16, 1975·No. 75-1225·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a careful consideration of the record and of the briefs and arguments of the parties, the Court has concluded that the judgment of the District Court in Bruce v. Scearce, 390 F.Supp. 297 (E.D.Mo.1975), is based on findings that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. For these reasons, the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed on the basis of the trial court’s opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon a careful consideration of the record and of the briefs and arguments of the parties, the Court has concluded that the judgment of the District Court in Bruce v. Scearce, 390 F.Supp. 297 (E.D.Mo.1975), is based on findings that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. For these reasons, the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed on the basis of the trial court’s opinion.

Dr. Helen Bruce v. R. Elliott Scearce, 521 F.2d 796, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 12749 (8th Cir. 1975).

Pincite

521 F.2d 796 (Dr. Helen Bruce v. R. Elliott Scearce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related