Dr. Glen Hurlston v. City of Princeton, TX

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: February 5, 2015
• Docket: 05-14-00574-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 4, 2015.

SIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00574-CV

DR. GLEN HURLSTON, Appellant V. CITY OF PRINCETON, TX, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199-00051-2013

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Brown Opinion by Justice Fillmore Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated August 14, 2014, we notified

appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file both his brief and

an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an

extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date,

appellant has not filed a brief, filed an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the

Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b)(c).

/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE 140574F.P05 JUSTICE S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

DR. GLEN HURLSTON, Appellant On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas No. 05-14-00574-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. 199-00051-2013. Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore. CITY OF PRINCETON, TX, Appellee Justices Bridges and Brown participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee CITY OF PRINCETON, TX recover its costs of this appeal from appellant DR. GLEN HURLSTON.

Judgment entered this 4th day of February, 2015.

–2–