Dr. Daniel Chaparro, III v. Kelly Paul D/B/A Pools Unlimited

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 30, 2013
Docket07-13-00014-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Dr. Daniel Chaparro, III v. Kelly Paul D/B/A Pools Unlimited (Dr. Daniel Chaparro, III v. Kelly Paul D/B/A Pools Unlimited) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dr. Daniel Chaparro, III v. Kelly Paul D/B/A Pools Unlimited, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-13-00014-CV

DR. DANIEL CHAPARRO, III, APPELLANT

V.

KELLY PAUL D/B/A POOLS UNLIMITED, APPELLEE

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 3 Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-563,965; Honorable Judy C. Parker, Presiding

April 30, 2013

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

Appellant, Dr. Daniel Chaparro, III, filed this appeal from the trial court’s judgment

in favor of Appellee, Kelly Paul d/b/a Pools Unlimited, which was entered following a

jury trial. The clerk’s record and reporter’s record have both been filed 1 and Appellant’s

brief was originally due to be filed on April 3, 2013. When the brief was not filed, this

Court notified Appellant of the defect by letter dated April 10, 2013, and extended the

1 It should be noted that both the trial court clerk and the court reporter filed motions to extend their respective deadlines due to delays occasioned by the Appellant’s failure to timely prosecute this appeal. deadline to April 22, 2013. Appellant was advised that failure to timely file the brief

accompanied by a Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Brief would subject this

appeal to dismissal pursuant to applicable rules of appellate procedure without further

notice. Appellant did not respond and the brief remains outstanding.

Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution and failure to

comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court requiring action within a specified time.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) and 42.3(b) and (c).

Patrick A. Pirtle Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dr. Daniel Chaparro, III v. Kelly Paul D/B/A Pools Unlimited, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dr-daniel-chaparro-iii-v-kelly-paul-dba-pools-unli-texapp-2013.