Dr. Bloom Dentist Inc. v. Cruise
This text of 288 U.S. 588 (Dr. Bloom Dentist Inc. v. Cruise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from the Supreme Court of New York.
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114; Douglas v. Noble, 261 U. S. 165; Missouri ex rel. Hurwitz v. North, 271 U. S. 40, 43; Graves v. Minnesota, 272 U. S. 425, 428; Lambert v. Yellowley, 272 U. S. 581, 596; People v. Painless Parker Dentist, 85 Colo. 304, 280 U. S. 566; Miller v. State Board of Dental Examiners, 90 Colo. 193; 8 P. (2d) 699; 287 U. S. 563.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
288 U.S. 588, 53 S. Ct. 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dr-bloom-dentist-inc-v-cruise-scotus-1933.